Attorney Liz Montgomery
Connect With Me
  • Home
  • About Liz Montgomery
  • Practice Areas
  • Contact Us
  • Blog
  • Check Out Palm Beach Compounding Pharmacy

For Entertainment Purposes Only

7/25/2014

0 Comments

 
This blog entry is simply meant to entertain.   I came across the following opinion years ago and couldn't believe the way the judge wrote about the lawyers.  I thought it was hilarious. 

Bradshaw v. Unity Marine Corporation, 147 F.Supp.2d 668 (S.D. Texas 2001), was a case brought by an allegedly-injured seaman against the dock owner allegedly responsible for his injuries.  In his opinion on the defendant's motion for summary judgment, Judge Kent commented on the attorneys' "work" as follows:

"Before proceeding further, the Court notes that this case involves two extremely likable lawyers, who have together delivered some of the most amateurish pleadings ever to cross the hallowed causeway into Galveston, an effort which leads the Court to surmise but one plausible explanation. Both attorneys have obviously entered into a secret pact--complete with hats, handshakes and cryptic words--to draft their pleadings entirely in crayon on the back sides of gravy-stained paper place mats, in the hope that the Court would be so charmed by their child-like efforts that their utter dearth of legal authorities in their briefing would go unnoticed. Whatever actually occurred, the Court is now faced with the daunting task of deciphering their submissions. With Big Chief tablet readied, thick black pencil in hand, and a devil-may-care laugh in the face of death, life on the razor's edge sense of exhilaration, the Court begins.
. . .

Defendant begins the descent into Alice's Wonderland by submitting a Motion that relies upon only one legal authority. The Motion cites a Fifth Circuit case which stands for the whopping proposition that a federal court sitting in Texas applies the Texas statutes of limitations to certain state and federal law claims.  See Gonzales v. Wyatt, 157 F.3d 1016, 1021 n. 1 (5th Cir.1998).  That is all well and good--the Court is quite fond of the Erie doctrine; indeed there is talk of little else around both the Canal and this Court's water cooler. Defendant, however, does not even cite to Erie, but to a mere successor case, and further fails to even begin to analyze why the Court should approach the shores of Erie. Finally, Defendant does not even provide a cite to its desired Texas limitation statute.  A more bumbling approach is difficult to conceive--but wait folks, There's More!
. . .

After this remarkably long walk on a short legal pier, having received no useful guidance whatever from either party, the Court has endeavored, primarily based upon its affection for both counsel, but also out of its own sense of morbid curiosity, to resolve what it perceived to be the legal issue presented. Despite the waste of perfectly good crayon seen in both parties' briefing (and the inexplicable odor of wet dog emanating from such) the Court believes it has satisfactorily resolved this matter. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED .

At this juncture, Plaintiff retains, albeit seemingly to his befuddlement and/or consternation, a maritime law cause of action versus his alleged Jones Act employer, Defendant Unity Marine Corporation, Inc. However, it is well known around these parts that Unity Marine's lawyer is equally likable and has been writing crisply in ink since the second grade. Some old-timers even spin yarns of an ability to type. The Court cannot speak to the veracity of such loose talk, but out of caution, the Court suggests that Plaintiff's lovable counsel had best upgrade to a nice shiny No. 2 pencil or at least sharpen what's left of the stubs of his crayons for what remains of this heart-stopping, spine-tingling action."

Hope you enjoyed it!

Please contact me for your legal needs in Jupiter, Palm Beach Gardens or throughout Florida, at (561) 602-4447 or [email protected] or visit my website at www.elizabethmontgomerylaw.com or www.jupitercollectionsattorney.com.
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Author

    Attorney Elizabeth Montgomery Specializes in Construction Law, Landlord / Tenant Law, Collections Law, Civil Matters, Contracts and Commercial Law in Jupiter, Florida and throughout the Palm Beaches.

    Archives

    November 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013

    Categories

    All
    Attorney Juno Beach
    Attorney Jupiter
    Attorney Palm Beach Gardens
    Lawyer Juno Beach
    Lawyer Jupiter
    Lawyer Palm Beach Gardens

    RSS Feed

Attorney Elizabeth Montgomery
Serving clients in Leon County and throughout Florida

Privacy Policy

We are committed to protecting your privacy.  The information you enter on our site is held in confidence between you and us.  We do not sell, trade, or rent your personal information to others.

(561) 602-4447
[email protected]

Website by Square D Marketing